Guide to moving a company out of Alaska

---

Start Your Redomestication Now

The Redomestication Process in a Nutshell

1. Enter your biz name HERE.

Then click "get exact price" and follow the steps.

Takes less than five minutes.

Submit payment securely online then sit back and relax.

24-48 hours

2. We prepare the legal docs.

Our dually-licensed attorney+CPA prepares the legal documents and sends them to you via DocuSign.

You sign. We take it from there.

Same Day

3. We submit the legal filings to the states.

We monitor the status closely, respond to inquiries from their offices, and send you weekly updates.

No extra charge. 100% success rate.

1-3 months

4. Approved! ✅

We send you a checklist of go-forward obligations and simple steps for your tax pro to follow.

120% money-back guarantee if we do not succeed.

Did you know? The average business that moves to a state without state-level income tax saves over $12,500 in taxes per year.

Still have questions? Schedule a free meeting with our attorney and CPA.

Redomestication, also known as redomiciling, refers to the lesser-known legal process of transferring or moving the "home state" of an existing Corporation, partnership, or LLC, from Alaska to a new state. It means keeping your existing company name, credit, and federal employer identification number (FEIN) without wasting time and money creating a new business entity, applying for foreign registration, or moving assets between companies.
— Prof. Chad D. Cummings, Esq., CPA

Start Your Redomestication Now

Guide to moving a company out of Alaska: the legal and tax rationale for redomestication

As an attorney and CPA who routinely evaluates entity structure, tax exposure, and operational continuity, I approach any guide to moving a company out of Alaska as a risk-management exercise first and a paperwork exercise second. A well-designed exit strategy should reduce ongoing administrative drag, eliminate avoidable state-level complications, and preserve the value already embedded in an existing entity—its contracts, credit history, and federal employer identification number (FEIN).

For most established entities that have relocated (or will relocate) their real operations, redomestication—also referred to as statutory conversion—should be the default mechanism under a properly tailored guide to moving a company out of Alaska. Unlike approaches that inadvertently create a second entity or force an asset transfer, redomestication is designed to change the company’s legal home state while maintaining continuity of the same entity. For a step-by-step overview, review a guide to moving a company out of Alaska through redomestication.

Businesses often underestimate the hidden cost of remaining tethered to an unfavorable legal system or administrative regime after they have effectively left the state. A thorough guide to moving a company out of Alaska must therefore address both the front-end transaction and the downstream compliance implications, including the practical consequences of lingering registrations, annual reports, and state-level exposure.

Why leaving the Alaska tax environment can be a strategically sound move

From a tax planning standpoint, the most important concept in any guide to moving a company out of Alaska is that tax outcomes follow facts. If management, employees, and revenue-producing activities have shifted, it is often prudent to align the entity’s legal domicile with the operational reality. Misalignment can increase audit friction, complicate apportionment questions, and create an unnecessary compliance footprint.

Redomestication is particularly attractive because it is a continuity transaction. By maintaining the same FEIN and entity history, a company generally avoids the cascading tax and administrative consequences that arise when owners dissolve one entity and form another. If you are evaluating options, begin with a practical guide to moving your Alaska company out of state that focuses on preserving continuity.

It is also critical to distinguish between “moving” a company in the ordinary business sense (changing where work occurs) and moving it in the legal sense (changing the company’s home state). A disciplined guide to moving a company out of Alaska addresses both layers so that the legal structure, tax posture, and day-to-day operations point in the same direction.

Why redomestication is superior to foreign registration when exiting Alaska

A common misconception is that “foreign qualification” in a new state is the same as moving the entity. It is not. A foreign registration generally authorizes an Alaska entity to operate in the new state, but it can also leave the company with ongoing obligations in Alaska. A rigorous guide to moving a company out of Alaska must explain that foreign registration is frequently a dual-compliance solution—not a relocation solution.

By contrast, redomestication is designed to transfer the company’s domicile. When implemented correctly, it allows the entity to avoid maintaining dual registrations as a permanent operating model, which can reduce recurring fees, filings, and administrative friction. Moreover, in a properly executed redomestication, the company can generally maintain its existing name in most cases, its FEIN, and its contractual relationships—key assets that are often more valuable than the filing itself.

For businesses that have truly and permanently exited Alaska operations, foreign registration may create the very problem the company is attempting to solve: continued reporting obligations, ongoing registered-agent maintenance, and an expanded list of compliance deadlines. For that reason, many clients find that a guide to moving a company out of Alaska via redomestication provides a clearer, more final outcome.

Why redomestication is superior to mergers or dissolutions for established entities

Mergers and dissolutions are often presented as standard “relocation” tools, but they are frequently overused. A merger can be appropriate in certain restructurings, yet it often introduces unnecessary complexity, higher legal fees, and more moving parts than a change of domicile requires. Dissolution, meanwhile, can be commercially disruptive and may create avoidable tax and contractual consequences.

In my experience, the most costly errors occur when business owners act on incomplete advice and dissolve an Alaska entity, only to discover later that they have interrupted vendor agreements, financing covenants, licensing arrangements, or customer contracts that were written for a specific legal entity. A well-constructed guide to moving a company out of Alaska should treat dissolution as a last resort, not a default recommendation.

Redomestication provides a legally elegant alternative: the company typically remains the same legal entity, simply governed by the laws of the new home state. This is precisely why a redomestication-centered guide to moving a company out of Alaska is so persuasive for companies with operational history, contract portfolios, and established banking relationships.

Preserving contracts, your FEIN, and operational continuity: the practical business case

The most defensible relocation plan prioritizes continuity. Contracts are not merely paperwork; they allocate risk, define payment rights, and establish enforceable obligations. If the entity changes, counterparties may argue that consent is required, or that assignment provisions have been triggered. Accordingly, any guide to moving a company out of Alaska should prioritize solutions that minimize contractual disruption.

Redomestication is advantageous precisely because it is structured to keep the entity intact while changing its domicile. That continuity generally supports the company’s position that its existing contracts remain in place, that its banking and vendor relationships can continue without interruption, and that operational systems tied to the FEIN remain consistent. For companies seeking a decisive, low-disruption exit, consult a guide to moving a company out of Alaska while keeping the same FEIN.

Practical continuity also matters for intangible assets: business credit profiles, payment processors, marketplace accounts, and customer-facing branding often depend on the historical identity of the entity. A relocation mechanism that preserves those assets is not a luxury; it is a core business requirement.

Procedural considerations that a serious Alaska exit strategy must address

A credible guide to moving a company out of Alaska must address more than filing mechanics. Entity moves intersect with governance documents, member or shareholder approvals, lender notifications, licensing requirements, and internal records. As counsel, I typically begin by confirming the company’s current structure, ownership authority, and whether its governing documents impose approval thresholds or notice obligations.

Next, the company must ensure that its conversion is implemented in a manner consistent with state statutes and the firm’s operational objectives. While redomestication is often the most efficient mechanism, it should be executed with precision: inconsistent entity names, outdated registered-agent information, and incomplete internal resolutions are common sources of delay. An effective guide to moving a company out of Alaska therefore emphasizes coordination across legal filings, internal corporate records, and go-forward compliance.

Finally, businesses should plan for the transition period. Even when the long-term goal is to cease Alaska obligations, the company should treat the process as a managed project—one that anticipates follow-up questions from state offices and maintains clear documentation for banks, vendors, and tax professionals.

Common misconceptions that lead to expensive mistakes

Misconception one is that “forming a new company is easier.” In reality, forming a new entity can force the business into an asset-by-asset migration, re-papering contracts, re-establishing credit, and re-issuing customer invoices—often while continuing to operate. From a risk perspective, that is a fragile approach, particularly for companies with regulated activity, significant vendor agreements, or long-term customer contracts.

Misconception two is that foreign registration “solves the problem.” As noted above, foreign registration frequently preserves Alaska’s ongoing administrative and compliance footprint. If the company’s objective is to leave Alaska behind rather than simply expand elsewhere, a well-designed guide to moving a company out of Alaska should focus on eliminating duplicative obligations rather than creating them.

Misconception three is that “redomestication is only for large companies.” In practice, even modestly sized LLCs and corporations can benefit because the value is not measured solely in annual tax savings, but also in reduced risk, simplified compliance, and preserved continuity of the entity’s identity and history.

Conclusion: selecting the right mechanism under a disciplined guide to moving a company out of Alaska

A sound guide to moving a company out of Alaska should lead to a single, defensible conclusion for most established businesses that have permanently relocated operations: redomestication is often the most efficient, least disruptive, and most continuity-preserving mechanism available. It offers a direct path to changing domicile while generally preserving the company’s FEIN, contractual portfolio, business credit, and—most of the time—its name.

Businesses that treat relocation as a mere filing exercise frequently incur hidden costs later, including contract problems, bank re-verification delays, duplicated state obligations, and avoidable professional fees to repair a flawed transaction. For that reason, the most prudent course is to follow a guide to moving a company out of Alaska using redomestication and to implement the move with careful legal and procedural discipline.

When executed correctly, redomestication allows a company to change its home state without disrupting operations—a result that is not merely convenient, but strategically important for protecting value while repositioning the business for its next stage of growth.

Start Your Redomestication Now

Domestication vs. Foreign Registration vs. Merger vs. Dissolution: A Comparison

Domestication is, in many circumstances, far preferable to registering an LLC or corporation as a foreign entity, especially where the LLC or corporation has permanently moved its operations and will not be returning to the prior state in the near future.

Some attorneys, unfortunately, confuse their clients by recommending a foreign entity registration in the new state, or worse, a merger, where a redomestication™ would have accomplished the goals of moving their business to a new state efficiently and effectively.

The top seven benefits of moving your company (LLC, corporation, or partnership) to a new state via redomestication™ to transfer your business include:

1. Maintaining your existing federal employer identification number, eliminating the tax headaches of forming a new company or transferring assets between companies (and inadvertently triggering a hefty tax bill from the IRS) when you move your business to a new state;
2. Keeping your existing business credit history and track record, safeguarding your reputation with clients, vendors, and creditors when moving your LLC or corporation to a new state;
3. Continuing your existing business name (in almost every case), protecting your most important assets when moving your company to a new state: your brand, reputation, and time you have already invested in search engine optimization;
4. Maintaining your existing contracts with customers and vendors because moving your business to a new state via redomestication™ does not create a new company: it maintains your existing company, saving you dozens (or even hundreds) of hours re-writing (and re-negotiating) contracts and changing banks;
5. Eliminating the need to continue paying registration fees and taxes in your prior state (assuming you have discontinued your operations there and have permanently relocated to a new state), potentially saving you tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in state taxes every quarter when you move your business to a new state;
6. Avoiding unnecessary IRS scrutiny because moving your LLC or corporation to a new state via redomestication™ is a tax-free transaction under the Internal Revenue Code; and
7. Reducing the amount of time you spend on administrative filings, saving you untold hours annually, by moving your company to a new state.

Before taking the "penny wise and pound foolish" approach of foreign entity registration or spending countless hours and exorbitant legal fees (and possibly taxes) on a merger or merger-gone-wrong to move your company to a new state, ensure you understand your options.

In most circumstances, redomestication™ (and not a foreign entity registration or costly and complicated merger) is the best route to achieve a change in company domicile to a new state.

Start Your Redomestication Now