Guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts

---

Start Your Redomestication Now

The Redomestication Process in a Nutshell

1. Enter your biz name HERE.

Then click "get exact price" and follow the steps.

Takes less than five minutes.

Submit payment securely online then sit back and relax.

24-48 hours

2. We prepare the legal docs.

Our dually-licensed attorney+CPA prepares the legal documents and sends them to you via DocuSign.

You sign. We take it from there.

Same Day

3. We submit the legal filings to the states.

We monitor the status closely, respond to inquiries from their offices, and send you weekly updates.

No extra charge. 100% success rate.

1-3 months

4. Approved! ✅

We send you a checklist of go-forward obligations and simple steps for your tax pro to follow.

120% money-back guarantee if we do not succeed.

Did you know? The average business that moves to a state without state-level income tax saves over $12,500 in taxes per year.

Still have questions? Schedule a free meeting with our attorney and CPA.

Redomestication, also known as redomiciling, refers to the lesser-known legal process of transferring or moving the "home state" of an existing Corporation, partnership, or LLC, from Massachusetts to a new state. It means keeping your existing company name, credit, and federal employer identification number (FEIN) without wasting time and money creating a new business entity, applying for foreign registration, or moving assets between companies.
— Prof. Chad D. Cummings, Esq., CPA

Start Your Redomestication Now

How a practical guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts begins: define the objective and protect continuity

A well-constructed guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts must begin with a precise definition of the company’s business objective: is the entity relocating its principal place of business, merely changing its “home state,” or attempting to reduce ongoing exposure to Massachusetts filing obligations and tax compliance? In my experience as both an attorney and CPA, most avoidable disputes and unnecessary expenses arise because business owners conflate a change in physical operations with a change in legal domicile.

When the goal is to relocate an existing entity while preserving continuity, redomestication (statutory conversion) is often the most direct mechanism. It is designed to move the company’s state of formation without the operational disruption that typically follows mergers, dissolutions, or multi-entity restructuring. For a structured pathway, consult a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts through redomestication, which explains the process, timing, and expected deliverables.

Continuity is not a cosmetic concern; it is a legal and financial imperative. Companies frequently rely on vendor agreements, customer contracts, payment processor relationships, financing covenants, professional licenses, and insurance policies that are drafted around the identity of a specific entity. An effective guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts must therefore prioritize methods that preserve entity identity and reduce the risk that counterparties treat the move as an assignment, novation, or termination event.

Why leaving Massachusetts can be a rational business decision: tax climate, legal exposure, and compliance friction

Many business owners seek a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts after experiencing the cumulative burden of Massachusetts compliance costs. These costs are not limited to income taxation. They often include the administrative drag of ongoing filings, registration renewals, and the time value of management attention diverted from revenue-generating operations to compliance maintenance.

Additionally, the Massachusetts legal environment can increase perceived litigation risk or raise the cost of defending routine disputes, particularly for businesses operating across state lines. While no state is entirely free from legal exposure, business owners frequently pursue relocation to align their corporate governance framework, statutory protections, and business planning options with a jurisdiction they consider more predictable for long-term growth.

Finally, Massachusetts nexus issues can arise when a company is physically operating elsewhere but remains legally domiciled in Massachusetts. A guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts should address that continuing to be “organized in Massachusetts” is not a neutral fact; it can carry ongoing filing expectations and create confusion in banking, contracting, and tax administration. The more permanently the enterprise has shifted, the stronger the business case becomes for a clean, legally recognized relocation mechanism.

Why redomestication is the superior mechanism for moving an existing entity out of Massachusetts

When evaluating options, a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts should clearly separate what redomestication accomplishes from what foreign registration accomplishes. Foreign registration generally allows an out-of-state entity to do business in a new state, but it typically does not change the entity’s home state. That distinction matters because foreign registration can create a dual-compliance posture: the entity remains responsible for many Massachusetts requirements while also taking on obligations in the new state.

By contrast, redomestication is designed to change the entity’s domicile while preserving continuity. The redomesticated company generally maintains its existing federal employer identification number (FEIN), retains its contractual identity, and avoids the unnecessary complications that arise when owners attempt to “start fresh” through dissolution and re-formation. To proceed efficiently, review a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts that focuses on redomestication and the practical steps required.

In addition, the cost profile of redomestication is frequently more favorable than a merger-based alternative. Mergers can be excellent tools when combining businesses or restructuring ownership; however, they are often misapplied when the only objective is relocation. A guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts should treat mergers as the exception, not the default, particularly where the transaction adds legal complexity without producing business value.

Key benefits: contracts, FEIN, and name preservation without operational disruption

Any credible guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts must address the three continuity pillars that matter most to sophisticated business owners: (1) contracts, (2) FEIN continuity, and (3) name/brand continuity. Redomestication is compelling precisely because it is structured to maintain these elements, thereby reducing the downstream work typically required after forming a new entity or executing a merger that changes the contracting party.

Contract continuity is particularly important for companies with recurring revenue, enterprise customers, government contracts, vendor terms negotiated over years, or regulatory obligations tied to entity identity. If the “company” changes in the eyes of your counterparties, you may be forced into renegotiations, consent requests, or updated onboarding documentation. A carefully executed move via redomestication allows the business to remain the same legal entity while changing its state of domicile, which is often a more defensible posture when responding to counterparties’ administrative questions.

FEIN preservation is equally significant. In practice, changing the FEIN can cause payroll complications, banking delays, payment processor holds, and avoidable reconciliation problems. It may also create tax reporting friction across years, including confusion about wage reporting, information returns, and business tax filings. For businesses seeking a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts that minimizes tax and accounting disruption, continuity of the existing FEIN is a decisive advantage.

Procedural considerations frequently overlooked in “DIY guides” to moving a business out of Massachusetts

Many internet checklists present a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts as a simple sequence of forms. That framing is incomplete. The legally correct strategy depends on the entity type (LLC, corporation, partnership), ownership structure, operational footprint, and the new state’s eligibility rules for conversion and domestication filings. The most common misconception is that filing in the new state automatically “turns off” Massachusetts obligations; in reality, Massachusetts may continue to treat the entity as organized under Massachusetts law unless the correct statutory mechanism is used and the corresponding Massachusetts-side steps are properly completed.

Another recurring issue is unintended tax consequences caused by selecting an inappropriate transaction. Dissolution and re-formation, for example, can trigger contract assignment problems, require new banking and merchant underwriting, and create avoidable federal and state tax reporting complexity. Likewise, a merger “to move the company” may introduce unnecessary governance documents, board/manager approvals, and additional filing layers that provide no meaningful benefit if the company is not actually combining businesses. A guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts should, therefore, treat redomestication as a primary option because it is engineered for relocation with continuity.

Finally, companies often overlook internal governance requirements. Certain operating agreements, bylaws, shareholder agreements, lender covenants, or investor side letters may require notices or approvals prior to changing domicile. An attorney-led process can align statutory filings with internal authorization so the relocation is both effective and defensible. For a process-focused roadmap, use this guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts via redomestication as the operational baseline.

Common misconceptions: why foreign registration and dissolution are frequently the wrong answer

In advising business owners, I routinely see two misconceptions repeated in otherwise well-intentioned guidance. First, there is a belief that foreign registration is a substitute for changing domicile. It is not. Foreign registration can be appropriate when a business maintains substantial operations in Massachusetts but also wants authority to transact in another state. However, as a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts, foreign registration is often an incomplete solution because it can leave the company with ongoing Massachusetts compliance exposure.

Second, there is a misconception that dissolving the Massachusetts entity and creating a new company in the destination state is “cleaner.” In practice, dissolution is often the opposite of clean. It may require winding up procedures, creditor notices, tax clearances or final returns (depending on the circumstances), and extensive operational re-papering. Moreover, dissolution can complicate the chain of title for assets, intellectual property, and customer agreements. Redomestication is designed specifically to avoid these disruptions while still achieving a change of domicile.

These misconceptions persist because many business owners are understandably focused on speed. A guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts should emphasize that the fastest filing is not necessarily the fastest outcome. When the wrong method is selected, the business can spend months repairing bank account issues, renegotiating contracts, and managing state notices. Redomestication reduces the probability of those downstream failures by keeping the entity intact.

Conclusion: the strategic guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts is one that prioritizes continuity and risk reduction

From a legal and accounting standpoint, the most persuasive guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts is the one that achieves the desired relocation while preserving what the business has already built: its contractual position, federal tax identity, and operational momentum. Redomestication accomplishes those objectives with significantly less disruption than dissolution, merger, or “dual compliance” strategies that follow foreign registration.

Relocation is not merely administrative; it is a corporate event that can affect financing, licensing, insurance, and tax reporting. It should be executed with the same discipline applied to other material corporate decisions. Where the company has permanently ceased Massachusetts operations and seeks a new domicile, redomestication is often the most efficient and cost-effective mechanism.

To proceed with an approach that is consistent, process-driven, and designed to protect continuity, refer to a guide to moving a company out of Massachusetts using redomestication and initiate the filing workflow as appropriate.

Start Your Redomestication Now

Domestication vs. Foreign Registration vs. Merger vs. Dissolution: A Comparison

Domestication is, in many circumstances, far preferable to registering an LLC or corporation as a foreign entity, especially where the LLC or corporation has permanently moved its operations and will not be returning to the prior state in the near future.

Some attorneys, unfortunately, confuse their clients by recommending a foreign entity registration in the new state, or worse, a merger, where a redomestication™ would have accomplished the goals of moving their business to a new state efficiently and effectively.

The top seven benefits of moving your company (LLC, corporation, or partnership) to a new state via redomestication™ to transfer your business include:

1. Maintaining your existing federal employer identification number, eliminating the tax headaches of forming a new company or transferring assets between companies (and inadvertently triggering a hefty tax bill from the IRS) when you move your business to a new state;
2. Keeping your existing business credit history and track record, safeguarding your reputation with clients, vendors, and creditors when moving your LLC or corporation to a new state;
3. Continuing your existing business name (in almost every case), protecting your most important assets when moving your company to a new state: your brand, reputation, and time you have already invested in search engine optimization;
4. Maintaining your existing contracts with customers and vendors because moving your business to a new state via redomestication™ does not create a new company: it maintains your existing company, saving you dozens (or even hundreds) of hours re-writing (and re-negotiating) contracts and changing banks;
5. Eliminating the need to continue paying registration fees and taxes in your prior state (assuming you have discontinued your operations there and have permanently relocated to a new state), potentially saving you tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in state taxes every quarter when you move your business to a new state;
6. Avoiding unnecessary IRS scrutiny because moving your LLC or corporation to a new state via redomestication™ is a tax-free transaction under the Internal Revenue Code; and
7. Reducing the amount of time you spend on administrative filings, saving you untold hours annually, by moving your company to a new state.

Before taking the "penny wise and pound foolish" approach of foreign entity registration or spending countless hours and exorbitant legal fees (and possibly taxes) on a merger or merger-gone-wrong to move your company to a new state, ensure you understand your options.

In most circumstances, redomestication™ (and not a foreign entity registration or costly and complicated merger) is the best route to achieve a change in company domicile to a new state.

Start Your Redomestication Now