What’s the process for moving a company out of Alaska

---

Start Your Redomestication Now

The Redomestication Process in a Nutshell

1. Enter your biz name HERE.

Then click "get exact price" and follow the steps.

Takes less than five minutes.

Submit payment securely online then sit back and relax.

24-48 hours

2. We prepare the legal docs.

Our dually-licensed attorney+CPA prepares the legal documents and sends them to you via DocuSign.

You sign. We take it from there.

Same Day

3. We submit the legal filings to the states.

We monitor the status closely, respond to inquiries from their offices, and send you weekly updates.

No extra charge. 100% success rate.

1-3 months

4. Approved! ✅

We send you a checklist of go-forward obligations and simple steps for your tax pro to follow.

120% money-back guarantee if we do not succeed.

Did you know? The average business that moves to a state without state-level income tax saves over $12,500 in taxes per year.

Still have questions? Schedule a free meeting with our attorney and CPA.

Redomestication, also known as redomiciling, refers to the lesser-known legal process of transferring or moving the "home state" of an existing Corporation, partnership, or LLC, from Alaska to a new state. It means keeping your existing company name, credit, and federal employer identification number (FEIN) without wasting time and money creating a new business entity, applying for foreign registration, or moving assets between companies.
— Prof. Chad D. Cummings, Esq., CPA

Start Your Redomestication Now

What is the process for moving a company out of Alaska, and why the mechanism matters

When business owners ask what the process is for moving a company out of Alaska, they are often really asking two separate questions: (i) what filings accomplish the legal change of domicile, and (ii) what steps prevent operational disruption, contract defaults, and avoidable tax friction during the move. From the perspective of counsel who routinely evaluates entity migration risks, the first and most consequential decision is selecting the proper transaction structure. In many cases, the most efficient and continuity-preserving structure is redomestication (statutory conversion), because it is designed to change the entity’s home state while keeping the entity itself intact.

A common misconception is that the process for moving a company out of Alaska necessarily requires dissolving the Alaska entity and forming a new entity elsewhere. That approach can trigger downstream problems: new bank account documentation, revised vendor onboarding, amended customer terms, and a renewed compliance posture that consumes management time. By contrast, redomestication is purpose-built to preserve the company’s identity and history, which is why sophisticated operators treat it as the preferred pathway when the business is leaving Alaska on a permanent basis.

For a structured, attorney-led path that is engineered for continuity, business owners should review the process for moving a company out of Alaska through redomestication and compare it against alternatives that frequently create duplicative filings or unnecessary legal complexity.

Why companies choose to move out of Alaska: tax environment, legal exposure, and administrative drag

Evaluating what the process is for moving a company out of Alaska requires an honest assessment of why the move is being contemplated in the first place. In practice, many companies pursue a change of domicile to reduce friction in their operating environment—whether that friction arises from recurring compliance tasks, administrative timelines, or the cumulative cost of maintaining registrations and filings that no longer match the business’s geographic footprint. If the company’s operational center has shifted, maintaining Alaska as the home state may become a recurring distraction.

Owners also frequently underestimate the indirect cost of remaining anchored to an increasingly mismatched jurisdiction. Even where Alaska is not imposing a direct tax burden in a particular fact pattern, the company may still encounter legal and procedural complexity that consumes internal resources. The result is that entity administration becomes a hidden tax: management attention diverted from revenue-producing work.

For companies determined to align their legal domicile with where they truly operate, what the process involves to move a company out of Alaska is best viewed as a risk-management initiative—one that can reduce compliance noise while preserving operational continuity.

Redomestication as the preferred answer to what the process entails to move a company out of Alaska

When clients ask what the process is for moving a company out of Alaska, my analysis begins with whether the company can accomplish its goal without breaking its legal continuity. Redomestication (statutory conversion) is specifically designed to transfer the entity’s home state while maintaining the company as the same legal entity for most practical purposes. That continuity is not a mere technicality; it directly affects contracts, banking, vendor relationships, and internal governance.

Redomestication is also superior because it typically allows the entity to retain its federal employer identification number (FEIN). From a CPA’s perspective, preserving the FEIN can materially reduce tax administration burdens and avoid avoidable errors in payroll reporting, information returns, and year-end reconciliation. From an attorney’s perspective, continuity of the entity supports continuity of contractual rights and obligations, reducing the likelihood that counterparties seize upon the “move” as a pretext for renegotiation or termination.

Accordingly, for many entities that have permanently ceased operating in Alaska, the process for moving a company out of Alaska via redomestication is the most direct way to achieve a clean change of domicile without inviting collateral damage.

Key continuity advantages: contracts, FEIN, and (in most cases) the company name

The primary reason redomestication frequently becomes the best answer to what the process should be for moving a company out of Alaska is that it is engineered to protect the business’s continuity assets. Those assets include contracts, the FEIN, and, in most cases, the entity’s name. Business owners often focus on the state filing itself, but sophisticated planning focuses on the items that will cause operational harm if interrupted.

Consider the practical implications. A company that “starts over” with a new entity may have to re-paper key vendor agreements, obtain new W-9 and onboarding approvals, update payment portals, revise lender covenants, and renegotiate customer MSAs that restrict assignment. Even if those tasks are theoretically manageable, they are expensive in time and professional fees. Redomestication reduces those disruptions by preserving the existing entity rather than replacing it.

To evaluate whether these continuity benefits apply to your facts, consult what the process looks like to move a company out of Alaska while preserving key business identifiers and confirm the expected outcomes before initiating filings.

Common misconceptions about moving an Alaska entity that lead to avoidable cost

Misconception one is that foreign registration in the new state is “good enough.” Foreign registration can be appropriate for temporary expansion; however, when the business has moved for the long term, foreign qualification often results in dual compliance—annual reports, registered agent maintenance, and administrative overhead in more than one jurisdiction. Business owners frequently discover too late that they have not actually changed the company’s home state; they have simply created another layer of compliance.

Misconception two is that a merger is the standard solution. In many situations, a merger is an unnecessarily heavy instrument for the goal at hand. It can entail additional documentation, more moving parts, and higher legal fees. Worse, the “merger fix” is often attempted only after a prior DIY plan has already created inconsistencies in ownership records, governance documents, or filings—requiring curative work that could have been avoided at the outset.

Misconception three is that dissolution is a prudent shortcut. Dissolution can be legally final, operationally disruptive, and potentially expensive to unwind if the business later learns it needed the existing entity’s history for financing, licensing, or contractual enforcement. For that reason, understanding what the process should be for moving a company out of Alaska must include a candid warning: do not dissolve simply because a web checklist suggests it.

Procedural considerations that should be addressed before and after leaving Alaska

Even when redomestication is the correct mechanism, the process for moving a company out of Alaska should be treated as a coordinated legal and compliance project, not a single filing. Governance approvals should be documented properly. Organizational documents should be reviewed for restrictions on conversion or change of domicile, including member/shareholder consent thresholds and notice requirements. If the company has investors, lenders, or key counterparties, counsel should assess whether informational notices or consents are advisable to minimize later disputes.

From a tax administration standpoint, companies should also plan for a clean transition in internal systems. Payroll providers, banking platforms, merchant processors, and insurance carriers may require updated entity documentation. The goal is not merely to be “approved” by a state filing office; it is to ensure the company’s operational ecosystem accurately reflects the entity’s updated domicile so that routine transactions—payroll runs, vendor payments, and contract renewals—continue uninterrupted.

In well-managed moves, the question of what the process is for moving a company out of Alaska is answered by both legal completion and operational continuity. For an integrated approach that prioritizes both, review the redomestication process for moving an Alaska company to a new state.

Why professional guidance is not optional for a high-stakes domicile change

Entity migration errors are rarely obvious on day one. They emerge later—during financing, due diligence, licensing, audits, or litigation—when the company is asked to prove who it is, where it is domiciled, and whether it has authority to do business where it operates. A poorly planned move can create mismatched records between states, inconsistent dates, or incomplete governance actions. Those defects can translate into delays, costs, and negotiating leverage for the other side at precisely the wrong time.

The best work is preventative. An attorney who understands redomestication and a CPA who appreciates downstream reporting consequences approach the problem with a shared objective: reduce risk while preserving continuity. That means anticipating issues such as contract anti-assignment provisions, name availability concerns, and the administrative steps needed to keep filings and internal records coherent.

For companies seeking a disciplined, flat-fee approach to what the process should be for moving a company out of Alaska, moving a company out of Alaska through redomestication is the most direct path to a legally sound outcome that avoids operational disruption.

Conclusion: the most effective process for moving a company out of Alaska is the one that preserves continuity

In most real-world scenarios, what the process is for moving a company out of Alaska should be framed as a continuity problem, not a mere paperwork problem. The objective is to change the entity’s home state while keeping the business functioning—without forcing customers, vendors, lenders, and internal teams to re-learn the company’s identity. Redomestication is frequently superior precisely because it aligns the legal mechanism with that objective.

When executed properly, redomestication allows the company to maintain its existing contracts, preserve its FEIN, and, in most cases, retain its name—all while avoiding the dual compliance and administrative burden that often accompanies foreign registration, and avoiding the expense and complexity of a merger. In short, it answers the “how” and the “why” with a single, coherent strategy.

For a clear, attorney-led roadmap addressing what the process entails to move a company out of Alaska without disrupting operations, consult the process for relocating an Alaska company through redomestication and proceed only after confirming the transaction matches your facts and goals.

Start Your Redomestication Now

Domestication vs. Foreign Registration vs. Merger vs. Dissolution: A Comparison

Domestication is, in many circumstances, far preferable to registering an LLC or corporation as a foreign entity, especially where the LLC or corporation has permanently moved its operations and will not be returning to the prior state in the near future.

Some attorneys, unfortunately, confuse their clients by recommending a foreign entity registration in the new state, or worse, a merger, where a redomestication™ would have accomplished the goals of moving their business to a new state efficiently and effectively.

The top seven benefits of moving your company (LLC, corporation, or partnership) to a new state via redomestication™ to transfer your business include:

1. Maintaining your existing federal employer identification number, eliminating the tax headaches of forming a new company or transferring assets between companies (and inadvertently triggering a hefty tax bill from the IRS) when you move your business to a new state;
2. Keeping your existing business credit history and track record, safeguarding your reputation with clients, vendors, and creditors when moving your LLC or corporation to a new state;
3. Continuing your existing business name (in almost every case), protecting your most important assets when moving your company to a new state: your brand, reputation, and time you have already invested in search engine optimization;
4. Maintaining your existing contracts with customers and vendors because moving your business to a new state via redomestication™ does not create a new company: it maintains your existing company, saving you dozens (or even hundreds) of hours re-writing (and re-negotiating) contracts and changing banks;
5. Eliminating the need to continue paying registration fees and taxes in your prior state (assuming you have discontinued your operations there and have permanently relocated to a new state), potentially saving you tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in state taxes every quarter when you move your business to a new state;
6. Avoiding unnecessary IRS scrutiny because moving your LLC or corporation to a new state via redomestication™ is a tax-free transaction under the Internal Revenue Code; and
7. Reducing the amount of time you spend on administrative filings, saving you untold hours annually, by moving your company to a new state.

Before taking the "penny wise and pound foolish" approach of foreign entity registration or spending countless hours and exorbitant legal fees (and possibly taxes) on a merger or merger-gone-wrong to move your company to a new state, ensure you understand your options.

In most circumstances, redomestication™ (and not a foreign entity registration or costly and complicated merger) is the best route to achieve a change in company domicile to a new state.

Start Your Redomestication Now